User talk:Micah008

Orphaned non-free image File:Iflokcbrickbrawlers.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Iflokcbrickbrawlers.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 05:12, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-pro football discussions need feedback

Hello! You have participated in WP:AFD disucssions involving semi-pro football teams in the past. The following two AFD discussions could use additional weigh-in as they appear to be stuck in "relisting" mode:

I am placing this notice on talk pages of users who have shown interest in the past, regardless of how they !voted in the discussion. If you do participate, please mention that you were asked to participate in the discussion.--Paul McDonald (talk) 22:03, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:LaCrosseNightTrain.GIF)

Thanks for uploading File:LaCrosseNightTrain.GIF. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:15, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:LaCrosseRiverRats.GIF)

Thanks for uploading File:LaCrosseRiverRats.GIF. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:15, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Walt Disney Parks and Resorts

"Unnecessary details for general history, not in correct format,..."
"Properly formatted previous contribution from Spshu to match the rest of this section, and be part of the correct calendar year. Also removed superfluous information which was not appropriate for a general history."
"Properly formatted previous contribution from Spshu to match the rest of this section, and be part of the correct calendar year. Also removed superfluous information which was not appropriate for a general history."
"Even though this new contribution clearly looks out of place within this article and isn't appropriate here, everything I do is being reverted back, so I am at least fixing the obvious spelling errors."

This article is completely mess up as it is not in prose form as indicated at the top of the article. So the section is not properly formatted NOT my contribution. Secondly, if you intent to remove superfluous information then continue on and remove stuff like "Bear Country is renamed Critter Country at Disneyland." That is superfluous to the over all parks and resorts segment represented by Disney Parks at The Walt Disney World. But you are doing so, it is more that you own the article, not improve it. Spshu (talk) 19:38, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not going to get into a war about this change with you, and I will instead just allow others to determine which edit they feel is better suited for this article. I don't disagree that this article is "completely mess up", but I am not sure how your contribution helped. Micah008 (talk) 12:39, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well you did get into an edit war with me for no reason. Because the contribution actually meets the prose standard not the timeline list that it has been tagged for. Enforcing the the format that is "completely mess up" is to disagree with your own agreement to that statement. --Spshu (talk) 23:50, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Epcot-related move proposal

I have initiated a move proposal regarding several Epcot-related articles that you may be interested in: Talk:France (Epcot)#Requested move 12 September 2015.
Regards,
Rob984 (talk) 13:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-a-thon in Madison

Micah008, I'd like to invite you to an upcoming edit-a-thon:

ART+FEMINISM EDIT-A-THON

Saturday, March 5th, 9:30 a.m. – noon

Madison Public Library (Madison, Wisconsin)

Bring a laptop! There will be snacks and daycare

RSVP on the event page if you plan to attend or have any suggestions. czar 00:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You received this message because you are a member of Category:Wikipedians in Wisconsin. To opt-in to future Madison event messages, add yourself to the mailing list.

Nomination for deletion of Template:2010 IFL Playoffs

Template:2010 IFL Playoffs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:31, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]